US POLICY TOWARDS THE WESTERN BALKANS REGION
Abstract
The article examines the evolution of U.S. policy toward the Western Balkans after 2008. The purpose of the study is to identify the main stages, priorities and instruments of American policy in the region under changing geopolitical conditions. The methodological basis combines historical-political and structural-functional approaches, which make it possible to trace the transformation of U.S. regional strategy in the context of broader geopolitical changes. The study demonstrates that after 2008 the United States reduced direct political involvement in the region, delegating a significant part of responsibility to the European Union while maintaining influence through security cooperation, financial assistance and diplomatic initiatives. The United States of America remains the only state with a global strategic presence and the ability to project power worldwide. It has traditionally been involved in major international crises and played a decisive role in resolving military conflicts in the Western Balkans during the 1990s following the col- lapse of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Despite considerable resources of both hard and soft power, however, the United States did not fully consolidate control over the region. Over the past two decades, the Western Balkans have achieved a certain degree of stability due to integration policies and comprehensive American and Europe- an financial, political, economic and institutional assistance. As a result, Slovenia and Croatia joined the European Union and NATO, while Albania, North Macedonia and Montenegro became members of the Alliance. At the same time, the region continues to face numerous unresolved problems, including territorial disputes, authoritarian tendencies, corruption and low living standards. The gradual transformation of the international system from unipolarity to multipolarity has turned the Western Balkans into an arena of geopolitical competition among the United States, the European Union, China and Russia. It is shown that growing strategic competition with China and Russia has renewed Washington’s interest in the region, despite the previous tendency to reduce direct engagement. U.S. policy toward the Western Balkans has therefore evolved from active intervention to selective diplomatic presence and targeted financial assistance. Scientific novelty lies in the systematization of the main trends of U.S. regional policy until 2026 and in clarifying the influence of both external geopolitical competition and internal regional transformations on its evolution. The study concludes that even the current isolationist orientation of Donald Trump’s administration, expressed through the principle of “America First”, does not imply a complete withdrawal of the United States from the Western Balkans, as Washington continues to preserve strategic instruments of influence in the region.
References
Brusylovska, O. (2024). Consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine for the Mediterranean through the lens of academic discourse. In O. Brusylovska, S. Erdoğan, & D. Irrera (Eds.), Multidimentional Regionalism in Mediterranean: Actors and Challenges (pp. 227–246). Odesa: Astroprint. [in English]. [Brusylovska O. Consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine for the Mediterranean through the lens of academic discourse. Multidimentional Regionalism in Mediterranean: Actors and Challenges / Eds. Brusylovska O., Erdoğan S., Irrera D. Odesa: Astroprint, 2024. P. 227–246.]
Carafano, J. J. (2025, September 4). U.S. diplomacy in the Western Balkans under President Trump. GIS Reports. https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/u-s-diplomacy-in-the-western-balkans/ [in English]. [Carafano J. J. U.S. diplomacy in the Western Balkans under President Trump. GIS Reports. 4 September 2025. URL: https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/u-s-diplomacy-in-the-western-balkans/ (дата звернення: 17.10.2025).]
Gafuri, A. (2022). Can democracy aid improve democracy? The European Union’s democracy assistance 2002–2018. Democratization, 29(5), 777–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.2012654 [in English]. [Gafuri A. Can democracy aid improve democracy? The European Union’s democracy assistance 2002–2018. Democratization. 2022. Vol. 29, Is. 5. P. 777–797. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2021.2012654.]
Gumba, N., & Gaidai, D. (2021). Experience of European integration of the Western Balkans and conclusions for Ukraine. New Europe, 12. https://neweurope.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Western-Balkans_ukr.pdf [in Ukrainian]. [Гумба Н., Гайдай Д. Досвід євроінтеграції Західних Балкан і висновки для України. New Europe. 2021. № 12. URL: https://neweurope.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Western-Balkans_ukr.pdf (дата звернення: 02.02.2025).]
Harding, E. (2025, January). The national security strategy: The good, the not so great, and the alarm bells. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/national-security-strategy-good-not-so-great-and-alarm-bells [in English]. [Harding E. The National Security Strategy: The Good,
the Not So Great, and the Alarm Bells. Center for Strategic and International Studies. 2025, January. URL: https://www.csis.org/analysis/national-security-strategy-good-not-so-great-and-alarm-bells (дата звернення: 09.01.2026).]
Koval, I. M., & Brusylovska, O. I. (Eds.). (2023). Global, Regional and Local Factors of Formation of the Modern System of International Relations: Monograph. Odesa: Astroprint. 520 p. [in Ukrainian]. [Коваль І. М., Брусиловська О. І. (ред.). Глобальні, регіональні та локальні чинники формування сучасної системи
міжнародних відносин: монографія. Одеса: Астропринт, 2023. 520 с.]
Krstic, M. (2021). Continuity and changes in the foreign policy towards the Western Balkans during the first year of Biden’s presidency: Third Obama’s or second Trump’s term? Politika nacionalne bezbednosti, 21(2), 175–200. https://doi.org/10.22182/pnb.2122021.9 [in English]. [Krstic M. Continuity and changes in the foreign policy towards the Western Balkans during the first year of Biden’s presidency: Third Obama’s or second Trump’s term? Politika nacionalne bezbednosti. 2021. No. 21(2). P. 175–200. DOI: 10.22182/pnb.2122021.9.]
Novak, Ch. (2025, February 10). Why southeast Europe should care about the U.S. To Vima. https://www.tovima.com/stories/why-southeast-europe-should-care-about-the-us-foreign-aid-freeze/ [in English]. [Novak Ch. Why southeast Europe should care about the U.S. To Vima. 10 February 2025. URL: https://www.
tovima.com/stories/why-southeast-europe-should-care-about-the-us-foreign-aid-freeze/ (дата звернення: 15.07.2025).]
Popovic, D., & Obrenovic, P. (2022). The Balkans in a multipolar world: Perspectives and challenges. FRESKA, 1(1), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.7251/ZNUBL2201157O [in English]. [Popovic D. Obrenovic P The Balkans in a multipolar world: Perspectives and challenges. FRESKA. 2022. Vol. 1, No. 1. P. 157–170. DOI: 10.7251/ZNUBL2201157O.]
Piatkiewicz, D. (2021, Аpril 21). 100 days of Biden’s new transatlantic strategy: Where does Central and Eastern Europe stand? Europeum,. https://www.europeum.org/wp-content/uploads/ppbiden100-edit.pdf [in English]. [Piatkiewicz D. 100 Days of Biden’s New Transatlantic Strategy: Where Does Central and Eastern Europe Stand? Europeum. 2021. Аpril, 21. URL: https://www.europeum.org/wp-content/uploads/ppbiden100-edit.pdf (дата звернення: 21.09.2025).]
Ruy, D., & Conley, H. A. (2021). Confronting stabilocracy in the Western Balkans: A new approach for U.S. assistance. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/confronting-stabilocracy-western-balkans-new-approach-us-assistance [in English]. [Ruy D., Conley H. A. Confronting Stabilocracy in the Western Balkans: A New Approach for U.S. Assistance. URL: https://www.csis.org/analysis/confronting-stabilocracy-western-balkans-new-approach-us-assistance (дата звернення: 15.11.2025).]



